@JSCA Here is the result on GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst Max. I consider it a fail.
While the improvement in overall quality is clearly there and she is beautiful, for starters we lost that very appealing full frontal pose with her leg and bare foot exposed. This happens because in such a minimal prompt the model is left with a very wide latitude on how the model composes the elements of the prompt. I'm willing to call your original one of those Happy Accidents that can only be replicated by adding in a lot of detailed instructions to guide the result.
Worse, to me, is the poor wing placement. I see this too often in these models. Sometimes only 1 wing instead of 2. In this case both over on one side rather than being properly rooted in her upper back. I basically put in specific instructions on wing placement, especially when the back is being shown.
So that's the good, the bad, and the ugly of this test.