"Silverback! (NSFW)
š As in the male muscular 'grey' or white haired and/or bearded man" This is the instruction in my beefcake game room. The caption / title today was the 2nd sentence back then. Of what not to do. And someone submitted... right: a gorilla. ------------ "Nothing about tagging in Challenge criteria", one participant complained when I asked them nicely to tag me at their submission. "š Tag me @Bonampak in the (...) comments," I had written in the instructions back then. "Coincidentally" they had submitted a 38 ā¤ļø creation with a PRO model into a 0-4 ā¤ļø unpopular creation game...
Some people get defensive when I ask them to exchange their submissions. Some go into the mode "offense is the best defense." I have heard it all. I hope. Especially from the ones who aver, it's my, the host's fault. That might actually be the case. In the overwhelming majority of cases it is not.
Yet, some people claim, if "so many people" submit wrong creations that I would have to write "š Do not rank those who follow the rules below those who don't," I would have a problem writing instructions for people to understand.
No. I write that in all my game rooms because other participants, the ones who understand my instructions perfectly and adhere to them come running to me after the games - rightfully so - complaining about haven gotten voted / ranked below those who have submitted off-topic creations.
These are some of the confirmed reasons why people submit wrong creations. As in: they have told me. Either in my own or others' games. (Other than the obvious cheaters). Some of this I have done myself.
Photorealistic high 64K resolution. Deep saturation, high contrast, ultradetailed. Dynamic angle. Silverback in the mist. Textures of fur richly detailed. Moody shadows dance across the creature. (Incredibly detailed jungle texture background:1.3) (Masterful use of negative space:1.3) Dynamic fierce ...